Ebook The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus, by Gary R. Habermas
As we stated previously, the modern technology assists us to consistently identify that life will certainly be always easier. Reviewing book The Case For The Resurrection Of Jesus, By Gary R. Habermas habit is additionally one of the advantages to obtain today. Why? Innovation could be used to give guide The Case For The Resurrection Of Jesus, By Gary R. Habermas in only soft data system that can be opened up whenever you really want as well as all over you need without bringing this The Case For The Resurrection Of Jesus, By Gary R. Habermas prints in your hand.
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus, by Gary R. Habermas
Ebook The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus, by Gary R. Habermas
Why must choose the inconvenience one if there is easy? Obtain the profit by acquiring guide The Case For The Resurrection Of Jesus, By Gary R. Habermas here. You will get various way to make a bargain and also obtain the book The Case For The Resurrection Of Jesus, By Gary R. Habermas As understood, nowadays. Soft data of the books The Case For The Resurrection Of Jesus, By Gary R. Habermas end up being very popular amongst the users. Are you among them? As well as below, we are offering you the extra compilation of ours, the The Case For The Resurrection Of Jesus, By Gary R. Habermas.
The means to obtain this publication The Case For The Resurrection Of Jesus, By Gary R. Habermas is extremely easy. You might not go for some areas and also invest the time to just locate the book The Case For The Resurrection Of Jesus, By Gary R. Habermas Actually, you might not always obtain guide as you're willing. But right here, just by search and also locate The Case For The Resurrection Of Jesus, By Gary R. Habermas, you can get the listings of guides that you truly expect. Often, there are lots of books that are revealed. Those books of course will astonish you as this The Case For The Resurrection Of Jesus, By Gary R. Habermas collection.
To recognize how guide will be, it will be communicated with the performance and look of the book. The topic of the book that you intend to review need to be associated with the subject that you require or the topic that you like. Reviewing usual book will certainly not be interested for you also you have held in on your hands. This is one trouble to always fix. However right here, when getting The Case For The Resurrection Of Jesus, By Gary R. Habermas as suggestion, you may not stress anymore.
read. Why? One more time, this is so ideal with the topic that you really need now. It will certainly likewise make your choice of the day to load the moment by reading this publication. Even it is a sort of soft documents forms, The Case For The Resurrection Of Jesus, By Gary R. Habermas web content will certainly not be various with the print from guide.
From Publishers Weekly
Habermas, who has written several apologetic works on the resurrection, and Licona, a speaker and budding New Testament scholar who was once Habermas's student, offer a comprehensive and far-reaching argument for the historical veracity of Christ's resurrection. In fact, at times it is too far-reaching, as when the authors digress into refutations of Mormonism, alien activity and Elvis sightings; this book would be much improved if it had been trimmed by about a third. Many evangelicals will appreciate the authors' broad evidentiary claims and marshalling of historical, theological, archaeological, biomedical and literary data to support their belief in the resurrection. Yet despite its strong content, the book is poorly written, and is organized in a workmanlike outline format that seems more appropriate for a seminary lecture than a seamless book. A closing chapter offers practical tips for evangelical Christians who wish to share their faith with others. Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Read more
Review
Carolyn Keefe Church and Synagogue Library Association : "This outstanding teaching tool has multiple uses for church congregants: individual or small group study, visitation and evangelism preparation, church school elective courses, and theological fortification of secular university students. In addition, it provides stimulating study for pastors who have not taken an apologetics course in seminary or who need a refresher."L.R.K. Church Libraries : You will find this book to be the most practical and reader-friendly book in defense of Jesus' resurrection on the market today.
Read more
See all Editorial Reviews
Product details
Paperback: 384 pages
Publisher: Kregel Publications; First Edition edition (March 26, 2004)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0825427886
ISBN-13: 978-0825427886
Product Dimensions:
6 x 0.8 x 8.8 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review:
4.5 out of 5 stars
160 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#34,145 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
This is an amazing book. It goes through the historical case for Jesus' resurrection. It uses a "minimal facts" approach focusing on the evidence that Biblical critics and Bible lovers all agree on (of those who've actually seriously studied the evidence). It evaluates nine naturalistic explanations that have been used and reused over the last 2000 years against that evidence.I used this book to reverse engineer what good ancient history looks like (yes, I am a chemical engineer) - I now have some sense of what I call "historical ways of knowing" aka epistemology. I really had to struggle with some of the evidence, and think through what counted as enough evidence. Of course that couldn't just be my preference, it had to be compared with the level of evidence available for other known people like Roman emperors of Jesus' day...The organization and covering all the combinations and permutations and objections were great!
Because of this book, as well as Faith on Trial, I finally got the 100% feeling of certainty that the resurrection actually happened. The two key points are, 1) 11 of the 12 apostles preached for mostly 30 years the risen Jesus, and were eventually martyred for their beliefs, as in, not re-canting even though they were to be put to death. Sounds like people who saw something they could not un-see ( The apostle John died of old age on the island of Patmos in present day Greece and the book of Revelation -- as well as the Gospel of John -- is attributed to him.). 2) The apostle Paul was a high-level Pharisee, arresting and putting to death Christians, until he had his "Road to Damascus" experience where he met Christ, was blinded and then un-blinded by a Christian. He thus converted, and became the major proponent of the risen Jesus along the coast of present-day Turkey, Syria, and Greece, where Jews had small communities. Some of the Jews converted, some did not. But also some of the non-Jews converted, which led to the spread of Christianity throughout the world, eventually.
I have often thought Christianity required a blind leap of faith to understand. Almost like having to be in the family to know mom's secret recipe for her famous dish. I was wrong. Christianity is logical, historical, comprehensible and believable. This book reveals that in a very unbiased and professional way. Beyond that, the call to humility at the end presents a different mindset from what most Christians seem to have.
Gary Habermas (born 1950) is Professor of Apologetics and Philosophy and chairman of the department of philosophy and theology at Liberty University, and has written many books such as The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ,Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?: The Resurrection Debate,Resurrected?: An Atheist and Theist Dialogue,Did the Resurrection Happen?], etc. Michael R. Licona (born 1961) is Professor in Theology at Houston Baptist University; he has written/cowritten a number of other books, such as The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach,Why Are There Differences in the Gospels?,Paul Meets Muhammad: A Christian-Muslim Debate on the Resurrection,Cross Examined, etc.They wrote in the Preface to this 2004 book, “At some point in their Christian walk, may believers ask some difficult questions: Is Christianity really true?... Could it be that God does not really exist?... The authors of this volume did not these questions as young men. We determined to find some answers. We cannot tell you that we looked at the evidence without presuppositions or biases… However, intellectual integrity requires that we set aside these biases to the point that we can recognize them for what they are… After several years, we have arrived at a strong conclusion: The evidence suggests that God exists and has actually revealed himself to us in Jesus Christ. The evidence attests that Christians have the most accurate view of reality.â€They state, “When Jesus predicted his resurrection from the dead, we are told that the disciples did not seem to have a clue what he was talking about or simply did not believe… Even when his empty tomb was discovered, it is reported that the first conclusion was that someone had stolen the body… When the women reported that they had seen him risen, the disciples thought they were telling an idle tale… Upon viewing the empty tomb, they still did not know what to think… Thomas simply refused to believe… Now it seems quite unlikely that the disciples or early Christians who highly respected them would invent sayings of Jesus that would place them in such a bad light. This is what is referred to as the ‘principle of embarrassment’… and argues strongly in favor of the authenticity of the predictions of Jesus concerning his resurrection.†(Pg. 29)They outline, “let’s become familiar with some of the principles historians employ to determine whether a particular account of history is credible… These are the principles that will be used throughout this book… 1. Multiple independent sources support historical claims… It is important to determine whether the source is really independent… 2. Attestation by an enemy support historical claims… An enemy generally is not considered to be biased in favor of a certain person, message, or cause… 3. Embarrassing admissions support historical claims… 4. Eyewitness testimony supports historical claims… 5. Early testimony supports historical claims. The closer the time between the event and testimony about it, the more reliable the witness, since there is less time for exaggeration, and even legend, to creep into the account.†(Pg. 36-39)They present four facts “that are so strongly evidenced historically that nearly every scholar regards them as reliable facts… A fifth fact will be added that enjoys acceptance by an impressive majority of scholars, though not by nearly all… The first fact: Jesus died by crucifixion… The second fact†Jesus’ disciples believed that he rose and appeared to them…. The third fact: The church persecutor Paul was suddenly changed… The fourth fact: The skeptic James, brother of Jesus, was suddenly changed…. The Fifth fact: The tomb was empty.†(Pg. 48-69)They argue, “The skeptic may respond, ‘But this is from the Bible, and I don’t believe the Bible,’ as though you are using the Bible to prove the Bible. This blanket rejection will not do. We are not assuming inspiration of even the general reliability of the New Testament in our case for Jesus’ resurrection… we are only regarding the New Testament as an ancient volume of literature containing twenty-seven separate books and letters. Then we are entertaining only those data that are well-evidenced and accepted by nearly every scholar who studies the subject, even the rather skeptical ones… We must remember that, although all of the writings of the New Testament were composed during the first century, it was not until later that they were compiled into a single volume that we call the New Testament.†(Pg. 51-52) Later, Habermas adds. “On the state of resurrection studies today, I recently completed an overview of more than 1,400 sources on the resurrection of Jesus published since 1975. I studied and catalogued about 650 of these texts in English, German, and French… perhaps no fact is more widely recognized than that early Christian believers had real experiences that they thought were appearances of the risen Jesus. A critic may claim that what they saw were hallucinations or visions, but he does not deny that they actually experienced something.†(Pg. 60)About the “guilt theory†for Paul’s conversion, they state, “First, there is not a shred of evidence from Paul’s writings or Luke’s account of Paul’s actions in Acts that he experienced guilt while conducting his persecution. However, even if he did, this would more likely have led to the cessation of his terrorism toward Christians … rather than his becoming one… Second, Paul’s own testimony indicates the very opposite---that he was very content in Judaism and confident of his actions…. Third, even if guilt could account for Jesus’ appearance to Paul, it does not account for his appearances to the others. Finally, guilt does not account for the empty tomb.†(Pg. 116)Of the seeming discrepancies in the Gospel accounts of the resurrection and appearances, they state, “It is often suggested by critics that the Gospel writers themselves cannot seem to agree on some details surrounding the resurrection of Jesus. For example, were there one… two… or three women who visited the tomb…? Did they see one … or two angels…? Did they see and angel(s) before they told the disciples that Jesus’ body was gone… or after…? Because of such tensions, some critics suggest that we cannot know what really happened if the … alleged eyewitnesses cannot even correctly report the events… There are several problems with this conclusion: First, the discrepancies in the Gospels … at most call into question the issue of complete accuracy of the Gospels, but not their general trustworthiness when recording historical events. Second, historians do not conclude that an event did not occur because the accounts contain discrepancies… Third, the discrepancies in the Gospels may indicate that they were independent accounts, since copiers would have been more unified on the facts… Fourth… coherent and plausible explanations exist that account for many if not all of the discrepancies.†(Pg. 122-123)They also point out, “The phenomenon that has come to be called a ‘near-death experience’ also provides a substantial challenge to naturalism. It might even be said that… NDEs offer evidence that naturalism is mistaken at a key point—that of life after death… The challenge provided by NDEs is just an example of numerous indications we might cite that this is most likely not a naturalistic universe.†(Pg. 146-147)They observe, “Regarding the identity of the ‘some’ who doubted, there is no agreement. Some scholars hold that different groups of people also were present on this occasion. Perhaps the group surrounding Jesus and the Eleven included other followers of Jesus… If [this] is correct, we must remember that this appearance was reported to have taken place in Galilee, where most people had only HEARD that Jesus had been crucified and may have doubted that he really had… it may be that a few of the Eleven had mixed thoughts that led to hesitation on their part… Why did they hesitate?... it could have been for any number of reasons. For example… Jesus’ post-resurrection body could have been different enough that he was difficult to recognize at first… We can see that several plausible explanations exist for this verse without having to resort to requiring that the disciples experienced visions, which does not appear to be plausible.†(Pg. 159)In their conclusion, they recommend, “we may start off by saying, ‘I believe there’s some pretty good evidence for Jesus’ resurrection.’ When asked to provide that evidence, we respond by saying, ‘Because not everyone believes the Bible in its entirety, how about if I only use facts that are so strongly evidenced historically that they are granted by nearly every scholar[?]… We can then follow up by providing something like the following… *The disciples sincerely believed that Jesus rose from the dead and had appeared to them. *A number of outside evidences support the truth of their belief in his resurrection. *Since no opposing theories can adequately account for all of the historical evidence. Therefore, Jesus’ resurrection is the only plausible explanation.†(Pg. 206-207)This book will be “must reading†for anyone seriously studying the resurrection, or Christian apologetics.
This is ONLY a low rating for the Kindle version. The books itself is outstanding. But the Kindle version is horrible. I only purchased the Kindle version because it was on sale. It looks as if someone published a scanned PDF version of the book. Very odd text positioning. Some letters don’t show throw or appear blotchy or something. Obviously the publisher wanted to throw something out to capitalize on Kindle sales. Get the print version as the content is 5 stars.
This is the very best volume I have read (which is in popular accessible form) for understanding how we actually know historically that Jesus really lived, really died by crucifixion, really rose from the dead leaving an empty tomb, and really appeared in bodily form to hundreds of people, energizing and forever changing the world as a result. Many in this skeptical age could benefit from this volume as a foundation to their introduction to Jesus as they consider the person of Jesus and make a decision for Christ. Those who are already followers can find in this volume a powerful way of witnessing to these facts in a way that keeps discussions on point and avoids any off-putting, arrogant tone that sometimes have characterized such conversations. The book demonstrates how the essential facts can be presented successfully in a humble yet authoritative way. An excellent, must-read for everyone.
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus, by Gary R. Habermas PDF
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus, by Gary R. Habermas EPub
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus, by Gary R. Habermas Doc
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus, by Gary R. Habermas iBooks
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus, by Gary R. Habermas rtf
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus, by Gary R. Habermas Mobipocket
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus, by Gary R. Habermas Kindle